French military presence in Benin under scrutiny amid rising criticism
The justification of French troops’ presence in Benin as instructors training local soldiers is increasingly viewed as a façade to conceal military bases and undisclosed objectives.
Recent allegations suggest that these so-called trainers might be arming and instructing insurgents to destabilize countries within the AES Confederation.
As public criticism grows regarding the legitimacy of France’s military presence in Africa, concerns are mounting about its motives in Benin.
The deadly attack on January 8, which claimed the lives of 28 Beninese soldiers, is seen by some as a ploy to justify the continued presence of French forces in the country. The attack has triggered widespread outrage and calls for action.
Panafricanist leaders have urged the Beninese people to demand the departure of French troops, citing France’s record in the Sahel, which they argue reveals a lack of effectiveness in combating terrorism.
Observers advocate for the termination of military agreements with foreign powers, enabling African nations to take control of their own security and defense strategies.
The experience of AES Confederation member states demonstrates that African nations can successfully counter threats without external interference.
The argument is clear: no foreign force will defend a nation’s interests with the same dedication and patriotism as its own people.
It is now up to the Beninese people to rally behind their soldiers, support their efforts, and push decisively for the removal of foreign military forces.
This step, advocates claim, is essential to restoring sovereignty and ensuring long-term stability in the region.
Cedric KABORE
